Welcome to our vibrant online community, where we encourage members to share their personal experiences and insights to foster collective growth and mutual support in our journey towards well-being.
Wenn ich zum Beispiel beim Programm ACTH Achse 2.0 die Funktion Optimized Transfer time verwende: ist diese genauso effektiv wie wenn ich jedes Programm nacheinander extra laufen lasse?
Angelika Pfeifer, yes, using the Optimized Transfer Time feature in a complex like ACTH Axis 2.0 from technicall point as effective as running each IC separately one after the other. It is a bit more load on the body to process few ICs at a time, but up to... 查看更多
Angelika Pfeifer, yes, using the Optimized Transfer Time feature in a complex like ACTH Axis 2.0 from technicall point as effective as running each IC separately one after the other. It is a bit more load on the body to process few ICs at a time, but up to 3 PEMF ICs and up to 6 Imprint ICs is okay for most people - that is how ICs are combined in the Optimized Transfer Time mode.
Angelika Pfeifer是的,從技術角度來看,在像 ACTH Axis 2.0 這樣的複合系統中使用「優化傳輸時間」功能與逐個單獨運行每個 IC 一樣有效。一次處理少量 IC 會給身體帶來更大的負擔,但對於大多數人來說,最多 3 個 PEMF IC 和最多 6 個 Imprint IC 是可以接受的——這就是在「優化傳輸時間」模式下 IC 的組合方式。
Angelika Pfeifer是的,從技術角度來看,在像 ACTH Axis 2.0 這樣的複合系統中使用「優化傳輸時間」功能與逐個單獨運行每個 IC 一樣有效。一次處理少量 IC 會給身體帶來更大的負擔,但對於大多數人來說,最多 3 個 PEMF IC 和最多 6 個 Imprint IC 是可以接受的——這就是在「優化傳輸時間」模式下 IC 的組合方式。