Welcome to our vibrant online community, where we encourage members to share their personal experiences and insights to foster collective growth and mutual support in our journey towards well-being.
Hi Anton would you help me understand how an imprint of DDW can effect biological change as my understanding is that the deuterium molecule being twice the size of hydrogen and thus interferes with the mechanism of ATPhase thereby reducing g energy production in the mitochondria is a totally physiological molecular effect and I am struggling to understand how an imprint as opposed to water that has been through a... 查看更多Hi Anton would you help me understand how an imprint of DDW can effect biological change as my understanding is that the deuterium molecule being twice the size of hydrogen and thus interferes with the mechanism of ATPhase thereby reducing g energy production in the mitochondria is a totally physiological molecular effect and I am struggling to understand how an imprint as opposed to water that has been through a physical process to remove deuterium can be effective. I’d love my understanding of this process to be expanded. Regards Mary
Hi Mary, thank you for your comment, good questions. DDW IC was requested very long time ago and I replied that time to the person
"As deuterium water is water that consists of deuterium instead of hydrogen, and deuterium nucleus contains 1 proton and 1 neutron and a Hydrogen nucleus contains just 1 proton, then theoretically we would need to remove a neutron from Deuterium to convert it to Hydrogen... 查看更多Hi Mary, thank you for your comment, good questions. DDW IC was requested very long time ago and I replied that time to the person:
"As deuterium water is water that consists of deuterium instead of hydrogen, and deuterium nucleus contains 1 proton and 1 neutron and a Hydrogen nucleus contains just 1 proton, then theoretically we would need to remove a neutron from Deuterium to convert it to Hydrogen and therefore decrease the amount of deuterium water.
Proton and neutron have a strong attraction force between them, and to split them we would need a nuclear fission reactor. Therefore it is probably not possible to "remove" deuteriom from regular water using relatively weak electromagnetic field." But anyways we decided to create IC of DDW as there were many request. It is really different from other ICs, because it pretty much means "IC from something absent". Same if we would record IC from some "pesticide free product", it would not remove pesticides from vegebales when imprinting them. But in general IC from DDW would be different then IC recorded from distilled water. In a way we are imprinting spectrum of H2O to our drinking water, so maybe in this way we intensify H2O spectrum of our water so that spectrum of D2O present in our water becomes relatively less intence. So actually from the point of view of organism we in a way get water with "lower concentration of D2O". I just thought about such a analogy: imagine screen that consis of white LEDs, it has many many LEDs, but few of them are broken and therefore they looks like dark spots. Working LEDs are H2O molecules and not working LEDs are D2O molecules. If we increase intensity of wokring LEDs they will be more bright and dark spots will look smaller and maybe will not be visible at all. Maybe that is what can be happening.
嗨,瑪麗,謝謝你的評論,好問題。 DDW IC很久以前就被要求了,我當時回复那個人:“因為氘水是由氘而不是氫組成的水,氘核包含1個質子和1個中子,而氫核只包含1個質子,那麼理論上,我們需要從氘中去除一個中子,將其轉化為氫,從而減少氘水的量。質子和中子之間有很強的吸引力,要分裂它們,我們需要一個核裂變反應堆。所以它是使用相對較弱的電磁場可能無法從普通水中“去除”氘。”但無論如何我們決定創建 DDW 的 IC,因為有很多要求。它與其他 IC 確實不同,因為它幾乎意味著“IC from something缺席”。同樣,如果我們從一些“無農藥產品”中記錄 IC,在印記時它不會從植物中去除農藥。但一般來說,來自 DDW 的 IC 與從蒸餾水中記錄的 IC 不同。在某種程度上,我們正在將 H2O 的光譜烙印到我們的飲用水中,所以也許通過這種方式我們加強了水的 H2O 光譜,從而使我們水中存在的 D2O 光譜變得相對較弱。所以實際上從有機體的角度來看,我們在某種程度上得到了“D2O 濃度較低”的水。我只是想到了這樣一個類比:想像一下由白色 LED 組成的屏幕,它有很多 LED,但其中很少有壞的,因此它們看起來像黑點。工作 LED 是 H2O 分子,不工作 LED 是 D2O 分子。如果我們增加工作 LED 的強度,它們會更亮,暗點看起來會更小,甚至可能根本不可見。也許這就是可能發生的事情。
嗨,瑪麗,謝謝你的評論,好問題。 DDW IC很久以前就被要求了,我當時回复那個人:“因為氘水是由氘而不是氫組成的水,氘核包含1個質子和1個中子,而氫核只包含1個質子,那麼理論上,我們需要從氘中去除一個中子,將其轉化為氫,從而減少氘水的量。質子和中子之間有很強的吸引力,要分裂它們,我們需要一個核裂變反應堆。所以它是使用相對較弱的電磁場可能無法從普通水中“去除”氘。”但無論如何我們決定創建 DDW 的 IC,因為有很多要求。它與其他 IC 確實不同,因為它幾乎意味著“IC from something缺席”。同樣,如果我們從一些“無農藥產品”中記錄 IC,在印記時它不會從植物中去除農藥。但一般來說,來自 DDW 的 IC 與從蒸餾水中記錄的 IC 不同。在某種程度上,我們正在將 H2O 的光譜烙印到我們的飲用水中,所以也許通過這種方式我們加強了水的 H2O 光譜,從而使我們水中存在的 D2O 光譜變得相對較弱。所以實際上從有機體的角度來看,我們在某種程度上得到了“D2O 濃度較低”的水。我只是想到了這樣一個類比:想像一下由白色 LED 組成的屏幕,它有很多 LED,但其中很少有壞的,因此它們看起來像黑點。工作 LED 是 H2O 分子,不工作 LED 是 D2O 分子。如果我們增加工作 LED 的強度,它們會更亮,暗點看起來會更小,甚至可能根本不可見。也許這就是可能發生的事情。
Thank you Anton- The only way to to test PPM of DDW is a saliva test that a few different labs do- One is the Center for Deuterium Depletion and is not cost effective....so in reality the IC DDW transferred would have to be tested- it would be great if Vie would test and divulge the PPM DDW per tranfer. In my opinion it is not DDW until tested - prove me wrong. Thank you, Jeff
Hi Jeff, thank you for the info about the saliva test! Agree, I don't think you can create DDW with weak EMF, but it will be interesting to see how it affect deuterium levels in saliva!
The cost of producing DDW is phenominal- or multiple distillations -time = $$. When I saw the IC I thought this was too good to be true! The test would be performed on the water - not the saliva. FYI.
I don't think it affects the concentration of deuterium in water for the reasons mentioned above, but I think it may affect the presence of deuterium in body if you drink it regularly, that would be interesting to check.