I am getting back in after some time away and have forgotten what I’ve learned. Could you help to clarify some questions please? 1.) An IC is a still also a type of PEMF correct? 2.) An Audible utilized with the IC hummer still expresses PEMF’s? Is it as effective as a PEMF? 3.) The glow pad is more effective than the IC Hummer at imprinting water? 4.) Under what conditions is the glow pad advantageous over the IC Hummer for use on the body? 5.) Can... 查看更多
I am getting back in after some time away and have forgotten what I’ve learned. Could you help to clarify some questions please? 1.) An IC is a still also a type of PEMF correct? 2.) An Audible utilized with the IC hummer still expresses PEMF’s? Is it as effective as a PEMF? 3.) The glow pad is more effective than the IC Hummer at imprinting water? 4.) Under what conditions is the glow pad advantageous over the IC Hummer for use on the body? 5.) Can an imprint still be used on the body and if so is is it expressed as a PEMF? Is it as effective? Thanks!
我離開一段時間後回來，把之前學過的東西都忘了。你能幫我解答幾個問題嗎？ 1.) 積體電路（IC）也是一種脈衝電磁場（PEMF），對嗎？ 2.) 配合積體電路蜂鳴器使用的Audible仍能發出PEMF嗎？它和PEMF一樣有效嗎？ 3.) 發光墊在印水方面比積體電路蜂鳴器更有效嗎？ 4.) 在什麼情況下，發光墊比積體電路蜂鳴器更適合用於身體？ 5.) 印記還能用在身體上嗎？如果可以，它是否以PEMF的形式表現出來？它一樣有效嗎？謝謝！
